Literature Review BPM

Question: Talk about theLiterature Review for BPM. Answer: Presentation The administration on the business framework follows the most developed strategies for the productive upgrade of the association before the general public and other serious associations. The Business Process Management (BPM) is a technique and a procedure of finding the adaptable targets which bolster the earth in various conditions. The working methodology of the association is found all the more productively in a successful way, so as to fulfill the whole techniques on the association. The business forms are the methodology and exercises for the best endurance and the executives of the association framework (Rouse, 2016). The way toward dealing with the business strategies, understood BPM engineering is executed for the accommodation of the administration. The framework may deal with the business procedure in a productive way. The design parts the administration procedure into the various divisions. At that point, the utilization of the advanced innovation on the BPM procedure give s incredible upgrade on the business. The straightforward work process weaving framework uses BPM framework in an association. This procedure may remember different effects for the administration procedure (Mondejar, 2017). The distributed computing contains the properties to tie BPM in a continuous savvy framework. Writing Review As per (Anand, Fosso Wamba and Gnanzou, 2013), the Business Process Management (BPM) started during 1990 and at present it for the most part spins and spotlights on the Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP), Case Handling (CH), Customer Relation Management (CRM), Workflow the board (WFM), Enterprise Application Integration (EAI, etc. Further, the paper characterizes the BPM with the execution on new innovations. In this paper, the creators have explored different papers from the year 2005 to 2011 and the exploration confirms that the advancement pace of utilizing the utilizations of BPM, BPR, and BPI. According to (Jalali, 2016), the viewpoint direction expects to help the cross-cutting worries in process models. Numerous perspective direction methods are created. For instance, the angle direction in administration sythesis and necessity building. In any case, these are just produced for the basic procedure models. It is expressed in (Heravizadeh, 2009), that there were intends to build up a well known administration approach for the executives practice and data innovation. To begin with, it builds up the quality mindful life pattern of BPM. It chiefly centers around the quality in business process the board life cycle. Second, this proposed model that considers the structure to plan the quality prerequisites for the business procedure model. It is important to plan these necessities as a lot of quantifiable components. At that point, the proposed technique at long last considers the issues of value in the business forms. This lead to build up the main driver investigation strategy to discover the issues identified with quality. As indicated by (Lahajnar and RoÃ¥ ¾anec, 2016), the base up approach is utilized for persistent improvement of the business forms in todays associations. For the persistent improvement of business forms, different methodologies are found. These methodologies comprises of cycle reiteration of exercises. The exercises incorporates PDCA cycle, for example, arranging, do, check and act. Further, the papers features on the AS-IS and TO-BE strategies. According to (Mller, J. Maack and D. Tan, 2007), it was resolved that the BPM has different points of interest in the business field. This paper centers around the idea of BPM and its element like the work process the board. It is additionally established that it is a lot of essential for the association to comprehend its responsibility to BPM and how the organizations need to thank and value the innovation of BPM. The BPM innovation is summed up as the long lasting cycle and it's anything but a coincidental sending. The administration must have away from of BPM to make progress and it likewise helps the partnership between the business chiefs and IT for a fruitful procedure change. It stress more on the unmistakable connection between the BPM, which is an administration, administration, a technique, a methodology, it helps in demonstrating discipline simultaneously and it helps in picking up process competency. It gives spontaneous creation and cross-process joining in culture and, aptitudes. This can give a successful authoritative change in the association. In addition, it is additionally expected to help in defeating the disappointments and clashes in the business. It is expressed in (Vanderfeesten and A. Reijers, n.d.), that the associations work more on putting resources into the work process framework usage for improving, robotizing and smoothing out the business forms. The primary piece of this paper investigates on the operational productivity for the social change and in the financial estimation of the association. It is presumed that the association of partners and administration alongside successful correspondence is significant. The examination likewise decided certain effects of work process the executives framework and the explanations behind the effect is that the work process framework mechanized crafted by the secretaries at the same time, it had affected by including extra work in various degrees of the association. As indicated by (Dhring, Schulz and Galkin, 2015), the new arrangements of adaptable work process the executives empowers the essential runtime control-stream deviations. Then again, it is resolved that the progressions must be handled straightforwardly on the particular work process model. This paper shows that the normal work process model can furnish execution adaptability ideas alongside perspective direction, runtime adjustment and variation development. At that point, the paper shows the proposed a conventional mechanized plan time model change procedure for separating the variation work process parts to the sub-forms and the adjustment forms is utilized with a particular example punctuation to create a selector structure that works on the sub-process that are recursive with the assistance of a standard motor. The procedure was assessed by a model change strategy with SAP Net Weaver BPM/BRM and it created a completely BPMN2 consistent executable ancient rarities alongside a sta ndard set. The standard set are used as a fundamental interface to the regularly changing procedure deviations. According to (Jalali, Wohed and Ouyang, n.d.), the paper has decided a lot of prerequisites which give subtleties of how the angle arranged business process models must order in a Workflow Management System. To make this conceivable a Colored Petri Net model for a help is planned. The condescended model in this paper is dissected with the assistance of state space examinations on different conditions. It is expressed in (Fang, 2010), that the paper further reveals insight into how distributed computing innovation ties BPM progressively shrewd framework. This paper establishes that the cloud assumes a conspicuous job in being mindful to give high accessibility and reacts promptly to the necessities of the application in the association. The examination on the different existing frameworks, gives numerous plans to making the framework increasingly compelling. This endeavor makes to broaden the structure and the board in an ideal conceivable manner. At that point, in the investigation of Business Process Management Demystified: An instructional exercise on Models, Systems and Standards for Workflow Management (WFM), the utilization of the Petri nets on the administration of the business procedure in an association is depicted for the successful administration (Bonn, 2010). As indicated by (van der Aalst, 2016), there are different frameworks, strategies, models, work processes and approaches present in the upkeep of business the board. The conventional arrangement of BPM followed WFM dependent on their own methods. At that point, the utilization of the Petri nets on the BPM secures significant things on the procedures. The displaying approach is diverse for every framework. The examples of the BPM is given as the XML Process Definition Language (XPDL) by the Work Flow Management Coalition (WfMC) and is analyzed by progressively central work methodology. The execution of the Petri nets on the BPM framework gives best and ground-breaking cellar for the association looking after system. According to (DER AALST, 2017), the BPM framework gives the business procedure stage for the straightforward work process weaving. In this procedure, the arranged framework engineering are largely straightforward to the whole administration framework. The monetary emergency is raised with the use of different administration frameworks on the association. In the interfaces working procedure, the information about the BPM procedure must be included by the creators. The procedure of work process depicts the whole arrangement of the administration on the framework. This straightforward work process weaving framework attempts to diminish the expense of the framework which is associated with the BPM framework. The incorporation of methods with the works by the administration area of the association, at that point this framework can be embedded in different programming which is empowered for the procedure of support. Rather than the use of the Petri nets the Aspect Oriented Programming (AOP ), the Model View Controller (MVC) and block attempt of wrapping are used for the administration forms. Thus, the expense of the framework can be decreased with the framework. The structured working techniques are associated with the product applications. At that point, the structure of the significant errands are interconnected with the product framework. The web type applications can diminish remaining burdens of the procedures. The procedures are empowered by the discovery framework through the current web application items. At long last, straightforward work process weaving framework gives the interconnection of the product framework with the web applications. The different investigation in (Pesic and van der Aalst, 2017), gives the procedures for the progressively changing conditions of the association. The strategy for the BPM is fixed in the underlying stages. The whole framework is dispensed to the area of the administration. The professional

Determining the enthalpy change for different chemical reactions Essay Example

Deciding the enthalpy change for various synthetic responses Essay I acclimated myself with the Material Safety Data Sheets of poisonous substances.PLANNING (A)Enthalpy (H)1 The entirety of the interior vitality of the framework in addition to the result of the weight of the gas in the framework and its volume:Esys is the measure of inward vitality, while P and V are separately weight and volume of the system.However, to make it easier, this definition can be abbreviated. Enthalpy (H) is a proportion of warmth in the system.To measure the enthalpy we need to initially make sense of the mass of a substance under a consistent tension and decide the interior vitality of the system.The enthalpy change (H)2 is the measure of warmth discharged or assimilated when a concoction response happens at steady pressure.Standard conditions3 are utilized so as to permit tests that are taken at various areas to come out with similar outcomes. Standard weight is 1 climate or 1.0135 x 105 pascals. Standard temperature is 25o C. Standard state is the physical state at which a component or a compound exists at standard conditions.Hypothesis: If the temperature of a given substance is known, we may compute the enthalpy of this substance.Experiment I Part IPLANNING (B)Requirements:- 1 measuring glass [250 cm3]-2 test tubes-thermometer-60 cm - 3 of 2 mol dm-3 hydrochloric corrosive strong anhydrous sodium carbonate (Na2CO3) [3.75 g]-balanceProcedure:We were furnished with 2 mol dm-3 hydrochloric corrosive, strong sodium hydrogencarbonate and strong anhydrous sodium carbonate.1. One individual in each pair estimated 30 cm3 of roughly of 2 mol dm-3 hydrochloric corrosive into the beaker.2. We took the temperature of the corrosive and recorded it in table 1.3. We weighted a test tube unfilled and than again when it contained 2.80 g of anhydrous sodium carbonate.4. We recorded the majority in a table like table 1.5. In this manner we included the weighted segment of Na2CO3 to the corrosive and blended the blend cautiously with the thermometer until all t he strong has reacted.6. While blending we recorded the greatest temperature of the solution.DATA COLLECTION2HCl (aq) + Na2CO3 (s)㠯⠿â ½ 2NaCl (aq) + CO2 (g) + H2O (l)Mass of cylinder + sodium carbonate28.17 gMass of void test tube25.37 gMass of sodium carbonate utilized (m)2.80 gTemperature of corrosive initially21.8 oCTemperature of arrangement after mixing22.0 oCTemperature change during response (?T)0.2 oCTable 1.DATA PROCESSING PRESENTATIONCalculating the enthalpy change:?H = ms?Tm = 2.80 g Na2CO3 + 30.00 g HCl = 32.80 gs = 4.2 J g - 1 K - 1?T = 0.2 oC = 0.2 K?H = 32.80 g * 4.2 J g - 1 K - 1 * 0.2 K = 27.55 JCalculating the enthalpy change for 1 mole of Na2CO3:M = 106 um2 = 106 gm1 = 2.80 g106 g 1 mole2.80 g x molesx = 2.80g/106g * 1 mole= 0.03 mole0.03 mole 27.55 J1 mole x Jx = 27.55J/0.03mole * 1 mole = 918.33 J?H = 918.33 J = 0.92 kJExperiment I Part IIPLANNING (B)Requirements:- 1 measuring glass [250 cm3]-2 test tubes-thermometer-60 cm - 3 of 2 mol dm-3 hydrochloric c orrosive strong sodium hydrogencarbonate (NaHCO3) [3.75 g]-balanceProcedure:We were given 2 mol dm-3 hydrochloric corrosive, strong sodium hydrogencarbonate and strong anhydrous sodium carbonate.1. One individual in each pair estimated 30 cm3 of around of 2 mol dm-3 hydrochloric corrosive into the beaker.2. We took the temperature of the corrosive and recorded it in table 2.3. We weighted a test tube vacant and than again when it contained 3.70 g of sodium hydrogencarbonate.4. We recorded the majority in a table like table 2.5. Accordingly we included the weighted segment of NaHCO3 to the corrosive and blended the blend cautiously with the thermometer until all the strong has reacted.6. While blending we recorded the most extreme temperature of the solution.DATA COLLECTIONHCl (aq) + NaHCO3 (s)㠯⠿â ½ NaCl (aq) + H2O (l) + CO2 (g)Mass of cylinder + sodium hydrogencarbonate29.08 gMass of void test tube25.38 gMass of sodium hydrogencarbonate utilized (m)3.70 gTemperature of corros ive initially21.5 oCTemperature of arrangement after mixing14.0 oCTemperature change during response (?T)7.5 oCTable 2.DATA PROCESSING PRESENTATIONCalculating the enthalpy change:?H = ms?Tm = 3.70 g NaHCO3 + 30.00 g HCl = 33.70 gs = 4.2 J g - 1 K - 1?T = 7.5 oC = 7.5 K?H = 33.70 g * 4.2 J g - 1 K - 1 * 7.5 K = 1061.55 JCalculating the enthalpy change for 1 mole of NaHCO3:M = 84 um2 = 84 gm1 = 3.70 g84 g 1 mole3.70 g x molesx = 3.70g/84g * 1 mole= 0.04 mole0.04 mole 1061.55 J1 mole x Jx = 1061.55J/0.04mole * 1 mole = 26538.75 J?H = 26538.75 J = 26.54 kJThermal decay of sodium hydrogencarbonate to sodium carbonate:2NaHCO3 (s) à ¯Ã¢ ¿Ã¢ ½ Na2CO3 (s) + H2O (l) + CO2 (g)This might be likewise appeared as an enthalpy cycle:2HCl (aq) + 2NaHCO3 (s) 2NaCl (aq) + CO2 (g) + H2O (l)Na2CO3 (s) + H2O (l) + CO2 (g) + 2HCl (aq)The enthalpy change for the deterioration of sodium hydrogencarbonate might be acquired by deciding the enthalpy change of response between sodium carbonate and hydrochloric corrosive and that between sodium hydrogencarbonate and hydrochloric acid.?H = H(products) H(reactants)?H = 0.92 kJ 26.54 kJ = 25.62 kJExperiment II Part IPLANNING (B)Requirements:- 1 recepticle [250 cm3]-2 test tubes-thermometer-60 cm - 3 of 2 mol dm-3 hydrochloric corrosive strong calcium oxide (CaO) [3 g]-balanceProcedure:We were furnished with 2 mol dm-3 hydrochloric corrosive, strong calcium carbonate and strong calcium oxide.1. One individual in each pair estimated 30 cm3 of around of 2 mol dm-3 hydrochloric corrosive into the beaker.2. We took the temperature of the corrosive and recorded it in table 3.3. We weighted a test tube vacant and than again when it contained 3.00 g of strong calcium oxide.4. We recorded the majority in a table like table 3.5. Along these lines we included the weighted segment of CaO to the corrosive and mixed the blend cautiously with the thermometer until the strong has reacted.6. While blending we recorded the most extreme temperature of the solu tion.DATA COLLECTION2HCl (aq) + CaO (s) à ¯Ã¢ ¿Ã¢ ½ CaCl2 (aq) + H2O (l)Mass of cylinder + calcium oxide27.92 gMass of void test tube24.92 gMass of calcium oxide utilized (m)3.00 gTemperature of corrosive initially20.0 oCTemperature of arrangement after mixing36.0 oCTemperature change during response (?T)16.0 oCTable 3.DATA PROCESSING PRESENTATIONCalculating the enthalpy change:?H = ms?Tm = 3.00 g CaO + 30.00 g HCl = 33.00 gs = 4.2 J g - 1 K - 1?T = 16.0 oC = 16.0 K?H = 33.00 g * 4.2 J g - 1 K - 1 * 16.0 K = 2217.60 JCalculating the enthalpy change for 1 mole of CaO:M = 56 um2 = 56 gm1 = 3.00 g56 g 1 mole3.00 g x molesx = 3.00g/56g * 1 mole= 0.05 mole0.05 mole 2217.60 J1 mole x Jx = 2217.60J/0.05mole * 1 mole =44352 J?H = 44352 J = 44.35 kJExperiment II Part IIPLANNING (B)Requirements:- 1 measuring glass [250 cm3]-2 test tubes-thermometer-60 cm - 3 of 2 mol dm-3 hydrochloric corrosive strong calcium carbonate (CaCO3) [3.75 g]-balanceProcedure:We were given 2 mol dm-3 hydrochloric c orrosive, strong calcium carbonate and strong calcium oxide.1. One individual in each pair estimated 30 cm3 of roughly of 2 mol dm-3 hydrochloric corrosive into the beaker.2. We took the temperature of the corrosive and recorded it in table 4.3. We weighted a test tube unfilled and than again when it contained 3.00 g of strong calcium carbonate.4. We recorded the majority in a table like table 4.5. Thusly we included the weighted part of CaCO3 to the corrosive and blended the blend cautiously with the thermometer until the strong has reacted.6. While blending we recorded the most extreme temperature of the solution.DATA COLLECTION2HCl (aq) + CaCO3 (s) à ¯Ã¢ ¿Ã¢ ½ CaCl2 (aq) + H2O (l) + CO2 (g)Mass of cylinder + calcium carbonate27.92 gMass of void test tube24.92 gMass of calcium carbonate utilized (m)3.00 gTemperature of corrosive initially20.0 oCTemperature of arrangement after mixing22.0 oCTemperature change during response (?T)2.0 oCTable 4.DATA PROCESSING PRESENTATIONCalculatin g the enthalpy change:?H = ms?Tm = 3.00 g CaCO3 + 30.00 g HCl = 33.00 gs = 4.2 J g - 1 K - 1?T = 2.0 oC = 2.0 K?H = 33.00 g * 4.2 J g - 1 K - 1 * 2.0 K = 277.20 JCalculating the enthalpy change for 1 mole of CaCO3:M = 100 um2 = 100 gm1 = 3.00 g100 g 1 mole3.00 g x molesx = 3.00g/100g * 1 mole= 0.03 mole0.03 mole 277.20 J1 mole x Jx = 277.20J/0.03mole * 1 mole = 9240 J?H = 9240 J = 9.24 kJThermal disintegration of calcium carbonate to calcium oxide:CaCO3 (s) à ¯Ã¢ ¿Ã¢ ½ CaO (s) + CO2 (g)This might be additionally appeared as an enthalpy cycle:2HCl (aq) + CaCO3 (s) CaCl2 (aq) + H2O (l) + CO2 (g)CaO (s) + CO2 (g) + 2HCl (aq)The enthalpy change for the decay of calcium carbonate might be acquired by deciding the enthalpy change of response between calcium oxide and hydrochloric corrosive and that between calcium carbonate and hydrochloric acid.?H = H(products) H(reactants)?H = 44.35 kJ 9.24 kJ = 35.11 kJCONCLUSION EVALUATIONDetermining the enthalpy change for a concoction response perm its us to choose whether a given response is exothermic or endothermic.If the enthalpy has a negative sign, as in the Experiment I, at that point the response is exothermic. Warmth vitality is developed, so the measuring glass becomes hotter4.If the indication of enthalpy is sure, at that point comparatively the response is endothermic, as in the Experiment II. Warmth vitality is assimilated and the measuring utencil becomes colder5.The physical properties of responses (various temperatures of recepticles) can be effectively recognized in the reality, even without utilizing any instruments.To assess this lab I would propose utilizing the calorimeter to make the records more solid than by utilizing thermometer. Room temperature may have had an effect on our outcomes and this was plausible the most significant wellspring of vulnerability. Masses of substances were estimated precisely, albeit some moment sums may have been lost while pouring. The weight continued as before, anyway litt le changes may have showed up. We likewise should focus on the measure of gas (CO2) that may have evaded during the trial. It should have been accumulated and put away to make the outcomes relia

How to Do a Life Review Using a Mind Map - Focus

How to Do a Life Review Using a Mind Map - Focus There are times in your life when you need to make significant decisions about how to continue in your business and/or personal life. At these points, it’s necessary that you establish a clear vision about certain life facts. This process must be honest and complete. And, sometimes, it can also be painful. In this article,  MindMeister Ambassador Jürgen Schulze shares his proven method of how to do an honest life review, using a mind map. In this article, I would like to introduce you to a method that I’ve been using in pre-MindMeister years when friends asked me for help. When I came across the online mind mapping tool MindMeister, this process was improved. I could add the new and fairly innovative dimension of collaboration to the method, resulting in the more formalized approach that you’ll find in the  mind map template Im sharing with you today. The mind map and the method behind it will help you during your journey of self-evaluation by compiling relevant information and presenting these facts in a comprehensive format to a friend for input. During this process, you will actually start to see  what you need to do and how. This is the mind map template: Your browser is not able to display frames. Please visit Life Review Template on MindMeister. Click on the Map Actions  button in the bottom bar of the map to maximize it. Click on the same button again to clone this template to your MindMeister account and use it for your own life review! From Napkin to Mind Map Life Is Not Linear! Before we dive deeper into how you can use this mind map yourself, let me just give you the short history of how this method developed in the first place. It all started years back when a colleague of mine shared with me his dilemma about choosing between two fundamentally different career opportunities. The classic Jürgen, would you have a minute for me? in the office right after the first coffee in the morning. What initially sprang to my mind to ask him was: What is it that you’d expect from what’s left of your business life? He replied that he had never thought about that in detail. I continued: What do you think you’re really good at? This is a question that is on the no-go list in todays formal job interviews as much as What do you think you’re really bad at? because there can’t be an honest answer. I got trained on that 16 years ago already in my hiring certification classes at Symantec. However, it is totally OK between two friends in a secluded setting. His answer struck me as I had a totally different picture of him. At this point it became clear to me that his situation and decision process would require some formalization and visualization. And this is how the map was born. Don’t Just Listen. Capture the Meaning! Why did I end up with a mind map, you might ask? There are a couple of reasons. Some, you might be able to relate to. Some are pretty individual to me: Structure does not develop in my head. Information does. That means that I have to put down my information somewhere and structure it there. Linear representation is difficult to structure and I hate scrolling back and forth. Hence, a mind map comes in handy: I can see things at a glance and add topics where I see a gap. While developing the method, I used a mind map to dump my thoughts and experiences in. After a while, these topics could be organized into clusters, which then mercilessly pointed out to me what was missing. I literally saw it! In short: Information creates clusters, shows missing information and promotes further clustering. A very creative flow. Putting things in a meaningful order requires a lot of shuffling around of information and re-clustering. Try to do that in a flowing text and you know why I always choose to use a mind map. When the mind map was finally as complete as I wanted it to be, the question was: How to present it to the target audience? How can a story unfold in the eyes of the beholder? Going through this map is not a linear process. While you answer one question in the map, another answer to an unrelated question on the other side of the map might just pop up in your mind. Because you always see the open spots, you can easily jump left and right, top and bottom and still stick to a structure. Collaboration is the key element of my method. Collaboration works perfectly fine when face to face over a glass of wine. But this is a process that will never come to a final conclusion, as previously noted. Thus, remote collaboration is a smart way to interact. Set the preferences for the map to notify when changes are applied and trigger off a constant flow of remote interaction, which will continuously fine tune the map. Last but not least: Seeing and listening closely are important  while working on such an intimate topic, but you need to go one step further and  truly capture the meaning. A mind map will help you to see things in context, and see  how they develop and relate to each other. This is key for being able to open up and challenge, respectively. When providing feedback, adding visuals to indicate feelings about a certain topic, emphasizing certain elements through formatting and showing consent or dissent by voting, commenting and, most of all, asking (Carl Rogers) are strong tools to drill deeper into the matter and look behind the statements being made. You are able to actually describe digital information (text, content) with analog elements (icons, formatting, position, relation) to create a picture in the mind of the collaborators that they can even talk about without the map in sight. Over a glass of wine, that is! (-; How to Fill Out the Mind Map Simply clone  the mind map template I’ve created to your account and start filling it out. My advice to you would be to start as you would in a typical mind map, with the topic located at 1 oclock, and then move  around the center clockwise. There is a logic in the order suggested in the map, but once you’ve started, you might see answers to other questions popping up in your mind, as previously described. Particularly, when you have a friend reviewing what you do and potentially triggering thoughts you would not have had on your own. The underlying concept of this technique is to answer a set of questions that are clustered under main topics, and have those answers challenged by a close friend. This way, your  self-image (self-perception) can be adjusted to reality by getting an understanding of your public image. However, it requires you to be courageous and to refrain from feeling attacked. In my experience, this process already raises new questions that will have to be answered to understand  the bigger picture and ultimately support the decision-making process. Like life itself, this mind map reflects constant learning and change. To arrive at the exact answer for things might be a challenge as we get older, learn new things and find new priorities in life. However, it is highly advisable to work yourself through all elements at least once in order to have a good and solid starting point for an ever changing life review. My own life review map is now 5+ years old and still in motion! As much as I am… Some Explanation on the Various Mind Map  Topics Vision The dream everyone has in mind. The big picture! Not the I want to be a billionaire-thing. It is about the ultimate goal one wants to achieve and the final destination in that very moment. Desire The journey is the reward. It should be fun and fulfilling. Thus, the way to achieve the goal needs to be clear as there are many ways to Rome! Skills This is where it  gets tricky. What can you do and what are you really good at? This is where self-perception can easily be at war with your public image. And this is where a good friend needs to be ruthless with her/his observations! Missing Skills Admitting whats missing is another painful exercise. But this reflection is required if you want to proceed to the next topic. Ability to Learn Putting things on a timeline makes it a bit easier to answer these questions. As Im getting closer to retirement, I dont bother starting off new revolutions. Improving on the things that Im already good at is what fits into the remaining time. Learning also becomes a bit more difficult with age. However, your choice! Willingness to Learn It is one thing to be able to learn. But do you really want to learn? Learning is progress but learning fundamentally new things might also be stressful. Something to be seriously considered! Strategy A wise friend of mine from Saudi Arabia once told me Failing to plan means planning to fail. Theres another approach, Laissez-faire, which can be useful as well, at a certain point in time. Living a life between boundaries can be limiting or rewarding. That depends on personality. Tactics When the strategy is the tool that youve chosen, tactics are about how to use the tool. This actually puts the strategy at test since a strategy that cannot be delivered upon is not a strategy but a dream. The Value of Life This is likely the most intimate question to ask. And it is likely the only constant in life and hence the most difficult to answer. Being consequent on your values and not bending backwards in times of challenge is a virtue. Network Dont be shy. Life is a give and take, a quid pro quo amongst friends and business partners. Giving is rewarding. Giving without expecting a return is altruism. Always giving without receiving is draining. It is my personal opinion that things will level to equilibrium during a long life. However, there can be a point in time when help is needed. And theres nothing unethical about asking people to return a favor. Professional Identity The classic self-/public picture exercise. This is where you might need more than one friend to give you honest feedback. How you WANT to be seen is not an invitation to act. This is an invitation to evaluate if you HAVE to act or if it is really you. Life in Balance Work gives us meaning, some say. That might be true. Or not. One thing is for sure: We spend more time at work than with our loved ones. It is important to draw a line and make sure that theres enough emotional energy left for yourself and your family after work. Work in Balance Last but not least: How far do you want to go when it comes to work? How much do you want to sacrifice? Clearly defining your limits will help you make a decision. It will also help you to be happy at work and, hence, happy at home! Wrapping up All of that said: Ive, again, gone through this map and come to the conclusion to do what Ive had in my mind for the last 10 years already: Writing a book. If you use my mind map template to do your own life review, Id be curious to hear what you learn and conclude!